Analysis on Three Main Sociological Theories

Sociological Perspectives an Analysis on the Three important Sociological Theories Abstract When taking Into consideration all neighborly sciences, legion(predicate) behavioral and cognitive theories have been developed and revised over the years. Although this Is adjust, near of the more(prenominal)(prenominal) influential and accurate theories have roosted almost perpetrately unaltered yet they still envelope modern day perspectives.Symbolic interactions, functional analysis, and the bout possibility be among these main harries they have been use to described diverse cyphers in guild and still carry to hold true to their definitions. With come along exploration and research, an overview on these concepts leave alone be given with contextual evidence. Keywords emblematic interactions, functional analysis, meshing theory, brotherly science, sociology, behavioral, cognitive Sociological theories ar used to describe and explain bonnie closely any occurrence In f amiliarity.From cultural customs and traditions, to street and white collar crime, to changes In social norms, the main perspectives can be used to find out their true repose and origin. E precise established sociologist has their own views, but for the most classify they will fall into categories having to do with the main three perspectives. For each topic, in that location atomic number 18 also many subtopic perspectives and theories to assist in explaining several(prenominal) of the more specific withalts by dint ofout life. For now, an overview between symbolic interactions, functional analysis, and the conflict theory will be given, with contextual evidence of each.Symbolic interactions can be defined as an individual acting upon or towards something base on their preceding interaction or interpretation with that subject. Any and all past experiences and feelings are combined to form a reaction to the subject. A great use brought up by James Hansel Is the meaning of coupling and all of Its components. This Includes factors much(prenominal) as marriage Itself, divorce, parenthood, and love. to each one of these concepts had a changed view one atomic number 6 years ago, fifty years ago, and horizontal ten years ago.They are constantly changing, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. When considering marriage pre-1920, they were entirely based upon essential and purposeful decision such(prenominal) as settling atomic pile and purchasing land, having kids, and investing. This was all much rather done with a companion. Now, when marriage is connections to each other. Two individuals may have separate lives and self- supporting, but Just want to marry for the sake of having a distinguishner. Divorces were also unheard of in the past. They were used only in the case of adultery or complete disagreement with domestic issues.But now, divorces are quite common, and no longer def residue failure but as success and a new start. (Hei nlein 17) We, as humans, are independent thinkers and can constantly Judge the actions of things around us. either last(predicate) factors in our environments can change these thoughts, but nothing can recant them. This is better known as our conscience, our individual though with no circumstances of elimination. A better description of this process was described by the originator of Symbolic Interactions An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration, The human being must be understood as a thinking being.Human action is not only interaction among individuals but also interaction within the individual. It is not our ideas or attitudes or set that are as important as the constant active ongoing recess of thinking. We are not just conditioned, we are not simply beings who are influenced by those around us, we are not simply products of society. We are, to our very core, thinking animals, always conversing with ourselves as we interact with others. If we want to understand cause, taper on human thinking. (Sharon 31) Sharon truly emphasizes, on the most basic progress to aim of our being, how we coexist to run shorther.On the inside, we are nothing more than animals with constantly changing views of society and the individuals factors within it. No matter how hard some will balance beam (and have tried) it is an impossible feat to completely change every someone to be like-minded, for there will always be change and differing in morals or ethics. Symbolic interactions will always be a relevant perspective as long as our brains continue to function. Connections and emotions will be transferred from human to human and from human to object to form a ample, total interrelated web.Functional analysis is a theory meaning society performs as a whole with many interconnected parts. All factors of society, such as customs of cultures and criminal activity, are embodied to create a functional environment. Generally designed by Robert Morton, functional an alysis takes every factor of society into account to provide a result. Sometimes these factors end up bringing unintended consequences, which Morton referred to as latent dysfunctions. For example, a long and long running custom in the Mexican culture is the indecorum at a 16 year old girls birthday.This signifies that the young skirt has made it to adulthood and takes on more responsibilities now. Say, for sake of a divinatory example, that the government required all girls to now eve their acquaintance at the age of 12, a doctor. Young ladies are now expected to get Jobs to help support the family and do more rigorous chores around the house. It wouldnt take long for the social lives and educational careers of the girls to plummet. Although these aftermath factors may not be expected when initiating such a plan.Changing gears and bringing in a factor from the opposite side of the spectrum, crime, be can also see how everything in society has a purpose. Also examined in a crim inal rightness class of mine, conflict theory is often viewed by criminologists and investigators in array to find origins for some types of crime. A paper written by down students from Cardiff University, I-J, depicts some of Deuteriums most influential ideas on functional analysis. Here, the students write about his views on fundamentally from the conventional path.While most criminologists treated crime as a pathological phenomenon and sought psychological causes in the mind of the criminal, taste saw crime as pattern in terms of its occurrence, and point as having positive social functions in terms of its consequences. Crime was normal in hat no society could enforce total unison to its injunctions, and if society could, it would be so repressive as to leave no leeway for the social contributions of individuals. Deviance from the norms of society is necessary if society is to remain flexible and open to change and new adaptations. (Bancroft) By this, we can settle that c rime existence only shows humanity and realism in an environment. To begin to completely demolish crime is a very idealistic and even impossible feat. I found this example to be one of the more interesting since crime has existed reeve and seems as though it will continue to exist. Even with corrections and punishment at the rate they rate they are today, crime will continue to perform as an interconnected part of society. Lastly, the conflict theory, Just as it sounds, involves all conflict oriented factors.Differences in power and control, whether it be an individual or group, spark social conflicts through society. This theory could also be used when describing how an individual may lay crime in order to get ahead of life. Often told as the American Dream, people in America have expectations of large houses, expert cars, ND other luxuries of life. When these are not obtained fairly, possibly because of monetary or social inequalities, some individuals will commit white collar and theft type crime to obtain their wants.Even for a successful person, they can sometimes stoop to low levels in order to provide. Alan Sears said it best, Consensus is a euphemism for ideology. actual consensus is not achieved, rather the more powerful in societies are fitting to impose their conceptions on others and have them accept their discourses. Consensus does not preserve social order, it entrenches transformation. Being above the rest is a desire characteristic for some people, and a social necessity for other. Regardless, this cause conflict between the persons involved.Group conflict is also relevant, especially with how connected the world is as a spherical society. Some theorists say that underdevelopment in certain Third World countries is truly meant to be. Lowly functioning nations are available for exploitation and colonization by larger countries. When a multinational corporation becomes powerful enough, they can even have influence on the development, wh ether it be political, economic, or other features of change. This is desired purely to show power and dominance or more area, which in turn can start conflict. Sears 35) Each of the above sociological perspectives has large significance when attempting to explain any problems or occurrence within society. Each can be used as a position to map how the structure of that specific situation should be, and how it can change to become the model structure. Although there are many subtopic theories, these main three will sure enough remain mostly unchanged within the social sciences for years to come. Bancroft, Ensues and hopped-up Rogers, edited by Pierre Staples (2010).