Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas Essay

Philosophers weather and encourage others to live according to the rules of hard-nosed wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were leash philosophers who sorted out variant h nonpareil(a)st approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the honourable thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life history-time, Kant discover province and responsibleness from respect for the law, and Levinas examined hotshots accountability to the Other. These unique points of lieu offer different answers regarding the search for the ethical.In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound in concert by interchangeable conceits. For example, distributively of the philosophers believed in optimism they thought that every(prenominal) humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using causality to be ethical. They accentuate the judgment of accompaniment well and acting well by using right habits and mature character to reach the proficient. Furthermore, they all believed in self fruition in other words, ethically be the best unmatchable can be. They all thought an ethical psyche must be rational and responsible for their actions.They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society. Aristotle lived during the B. C. epoch and established the belief of teleological ethics. This factor that ethics has a purpose or a reason. He stressed the plan of doctrine of the mean maintaining balance in unmatcheds actions. Additionally, he theorized the view of developing virtuous habits to build exhaustively character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how reaching iodines potential by living well and acting well pull up stakes ultimately lead to happiness.Moreover, he stated one should base ones actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire. Immanuel Ka nt was a philosopher who lived the majority his life in the 1700s. He believed that an unmarried should apply beau ideal, freedom, and immortality to be able to pursue and name the absolute good. He equivalentwise believed in deontological ethics, meaning it is ones obligation and duty to do what is right. Kant said that an individual must utilization intellect, free forget, and reason to give out this duty.He is confusable to Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all hoi polloi to act in an ethical trend by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society.He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out ones duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to march on anything in return while perform ethical tasks even though one might not like it one should act ethically out of the righteousness in ones heart. On the other h and, Aristotle believed one should act ethically as part of a community based on politics. He in like manner expected a benefit in return, contrary to Kant.Aristotle said that it is ideal to attain a reasonable means in ethics, and he expected to gain something like happiness for instance in return. Also, contrary to Aristotles theory, Kants theory proposes that it is not very possible to fulfill the supreme good in ones lifetime. He suggested that humans must get to this good in a life after death. This proves that their theories regarding how to achieve the supreme good differ considerably. Emmanuel Levinas was a Jewish philosopher of the twentieth century. He observed that the West cerebrate on the Unity of Beings, not the Hebrew infinity.The Hebrew Infinity focuses on singularity and singularity of things which gives them identity. Levinas based his ethics on this concept. Levinas believed one encounters the good or immortal in all individuals or in creation. He said o ne of necessity to recognize these traces, accept them, and respond to them. He talked about the thrill of astonishment, which is a verbal expression to face experience that touches one deeply. Additionally, he suggested that the face of the stranger (the Other) demands that you recognize it and run it hospitality. Thus, the face becomes ethical. He had this whole idea of promoting freedom rather than limiting it.He believed that the face is a trace of God that refuses to use power. Instead, the face calls one to be responsible by humbly beckoning those that passes by. Kant also had similar theories as Levinas because both of them evince that God is necessary for a person to act ethically. In other words, they include God in their search for the good. Kant believed one cannot do this without God, whereas Levinas believed humans are move by God to do good. With the concept of the Other, Levinas suggested that humans have a responsibility to respond with caring and compassion.Simi larly, Kant also believed in caring and compassion because he believed in the Universal Law if it is an act that is good for everyone, then it is good for an individual. It is evident that Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches that aided them in their search for the good. patronage the fact that they have several similar theories, each philosopher has many unique theories that will continue to help future generations percolate to live ethically and to ultimately achieve the greater good.