Minor Literature - Deleuze and Guattari

Michel Foucault states that, one writes in order to pay back opposite than what one is. In recital studies, Leigh Gilmore takes Foucaults dictum and explains it as follows: account offers an opportunity for self-transubstantiateation. Moreover, by creation less a herald with a fixed heart summarized at the end of a long life, muniment becomes a speculative project in how to become other. Here, the transformative effect of autobiography guides at one performative reflexion of literature.\nJonathan Culler points at the performativity of literature by stating that first, literary utterance introduces into being characters and their runs, and second, literary works bring into being ideas, concepts, which they deploy. Culler concludes that literature takes its direct among the acts of language that transform the world, manner of speaking into being the things that they name. In this regard, Cullers ideas jibe one further point to Foucauldian sense of transformati ve effect of writing, in the way that, writing butt joint not only transform the self  but likewise transform the world. In both movements, we can disclose the performativity of literature.\nIn this regard, let us discuss J. L. Austins and Judith butlers use of performativity with Cullers interpretations. Culler states that Austin is interested in how the repetition of a jurisprudence on a individual occasion makes something happen (you do a promise), while for Butler this is a special case of the massive and obligatory repetition that produces historical and favorable realities (you become a woman). Culler defines Austins understanding of the performative as follows: Performative utterances do not retrace but perform the action they designate.\nCuller quotes Butler, who says that queer derives its force on the button through the repeated conjuration by which a social bond among homophobic communities is make through time. This example indicates the ban as pect of pe...