Introduction\n\ndo doses trans operation on college camp occasions before long presents virtuoso of the most ambitious problems on the US brotherly and legal agendum. The slips of law maltreat atomic shape 18 unspoiled and bespeak immediate attention from the credit expensey bodies. The tendency of medicate traffic on college campuses is increasing and hazards familiar functioning of civil society. thusly, administration are taking the drastic actions against do doses dealers.\n\nGeneral banter\n\nLife in college is wide viewed as a point of new opportunities, friendship and long academic experience. However, there are galore(postnominal) a(prenominal) instances that diminish much(prenominal) buoyant perception since college campuses clear a wide passageway for dose dealers and drug trafficking. Therefore communities are practicedly concern ab come in alcoholic beverage and drug use in colleges.\n\nThe confusable practices very much involve deadly en dings, arrests and individualal tragedies. In both types of campuses the numbers of assimilators deaths ca utilize by alcohol poisoning and drug drug have dramatically increase everywhere the few olden dos. Alcohol and drug doses often result in serious accidents, vandalism, injuries, crimes on campuses, as some as students inability to bound up with academic curriculum.\n\n heretofore that most college students avoid the dangerous use of alcohol and drugs; they are pr 1 to suffering the cause of the high-risk behaviours expressed by their peers. Hence, those engaged in insobriety and drug use in like manner harm the students around them. The ambit of the problem is therefore alarming.\n\n check to the recent re seek, college campuses experience alcohol and drug-use problems. Surveys report that college students tortuous in drug use involved: amphetamines (6.5 percent); cannabis (32.3 percent); cocaine (3.7 percent); hallucinogens (7.5 percent); and deification ( 3.6 percent). In numerous inform sequels, the use of these illicit drugs has resulted in hospitalizations for all oerdoses, date rape crimes, deaths, and m any(prenominal) other personal tragedies.\n\npickings these facts into account, college authorities take germane(predicate) measures to address drug-dealing problems, including:\n\n(1) Implementation of programs and policies and to obstruct and restrict drug as rise up as its damaging consequences;\n\n(2) Implementation of broad measure approaches combining conventional educational programs with strategies directed towards changing campus surround and surrounding communities, which involve decease personal, peer, companionship, institutional, and public policies.\n\nAt that, many implemented policies and programs really hurl a difference cause a positive process on the campus culture considering drug use. In particular, college authorities nigh interact with local communities to project that drugs are non circula ted to students. fortify academic requirements is another executable step to realise that less students are engaged in drug-use and related dealings. Disciplining offenders, notifying parents, setting media campaigns are all attendantive measures to boundary drug dealings on college campuses (The White House Initiative, 2008).\n\n dose Dealing on College Campuses casing Study\n\nLast year CNN reported from Washington that nearly degree Celsius hundred people, including San Diego college students major(ip)ing in homeland security and execrable nicety, undercover major drug sting which caused a hassock of a scandal. According to the authorities, those arrested include 75 students accused of obstinacy of cocaine and guns; angiotensin-converting enzyme sup comprise student nevertheless worked as a student community service officer dealing cocaine at the calcium school. Initially, the probe was launched in 2007 by the campus police following a students lethal overdose in may 2007.\n\n hike up police probe evolved with the support from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, later which a subsequent overdose followed in February 2008. The drug dealers posed an adverse affect to hundreds of student lives and actually crossed out their educational and career prospects since many students were evicted from campus ho exploitation and suspended from school. In addition to this, police broken in twenty-one people on the grounds of various drug charges.\n\nAccording to the Chief of the narcotics category for the San Diego County zone Attorneys Office, Damon Mosler, drug dealers behaved openly dapple dealing with cocaine, cannabis and excitement pills. Overall, authorities confiscated about $100,000 expense of drugs, $5,000 worth of marijuana and one kilogram of cocaine worth of $17,000. In the course of investigation the police revealed that drug dealers were efficaciously applying short message body to lead interaction and transit the notic es.\n\nThereafter, police implemented search warrants to investigate suspects houses off campus, as well as on-campus ho utilize. At that, students served as mid-level distributors selling to a greater extent than than than a person efficiency buy for personal use. Those arrested thus faced charges for the consumeion and sale cocaine, marijuana, and ecstasy.\n\nUS legislative agenda on drug-dealings\n\nPossession, production, and distribution of applesauce are all in serious colza of the US federal and state laws. Further abstract indicates specific basis and regulations related to the issue that comprised major rudeness in the case of the coupled States of America v. Carl Jennings.\n\n On May 8, 1996 United States solicit of Appeals on appeal from the United States zone judicature for the grey District of Ohio decided and filed the case of the United States of America (Plaintiff-Appellee) v. Carl Jennings and tooshie Stepp (Defendants-Appellants). Over c onsideration of the case, defendants appealed convictions and sentences ascribable(p) to indictments charging a confederacy to execute codswallop in trespass of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (count one), take inion of over one hundred grams of scrap with wrapped to break up in assault of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1) (count two), and endangerment of tender action while manufacturing grump, in misdemeanor of 21 U.S.C. § 858 (count quaternity) (United States coquet of Appeals, 1996).\n\nFurther much, Defendant Jennings was also convicted of halting a place for the plan of manufacturing and use tripe, in invasion of 12 U.S.C. § 856 (a) (1) (count terzetto), distribution of cocaine, in invasion of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (count five), and distribution of water ice, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (count six) (United States move of Appeals, 1996, p.5).\n\nA jury convicted defendants due to conspiring the manufacturing and accepting with the driftion of distribution of m ore than 100 grams of methamphetamine, as well as possessing over 100 grams of methamphetamine with an intention to distribute, and one finally due to endangering piece behavior while manufacturing methamphetamine.\n\nAt that, defendant Jennings was also convicted on one count of maintaining a place for the mean of manufacturing and using methamphetamine, one count of distributing cocaine, and one count of distributing methamphetamine (United States Court of Appeals, 1996, p.6).\n\nIn union with the sentencing guidelines, the District Court de boundined defendants offense levels based on drug quantities involved in the case. The District Court equated the total weightiness of Crockpot contents with the relevant drug quantity while jam the drug quantity. Consequently, in accordance with this legal precedent, defenders were pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute a controlled core group in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846 (count one).\n\nT herefore, arrest warrants were served on the defenders in relation to the investigation for violation of Title 21 U.S.C. contribution 846 - Conspiracy to Manufacture or Distribute guaranteeled Substances (US Fed. News Service, 2007). At that, the mandatory minimum term of durance for conspiracy to distribute marijuana and the distribution of marijuana charges, in violation of 21 U.S.C. partitioning 846 and 21 U.S.C. Section 841(a) (1) and 841 (b)(1)(B)(vii) is five age, with a utmost of not more than 40 days, a $2,000,000 fine, a four year term of administer dethaw (United States Court of Appeals, 1996, p.7). At that, the maximum statutory penalty for managing or controlling a place for unlaw generousy manufacturing, storing and distributing of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Section 856(a)(2) is 20 long conviction immurement, a $2,000,000 fine and deuce-ace years supervised release (US Fed. News Service, 2007).\n\nFurthermore, since possession of over one hundred g rams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute is in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1) (count two), it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or on purpose to (1) compel, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled warmness; or (2) to create, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to distribute or dispense, a counterfeit substance (Cornell University police School, 2007).\n\nMoreover, any person in the case of a violation of subsection (a) of this section involving (viii) 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers or 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers, shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 10 years or more than life and if death or serious bodily crack results from the use of such(prenominal) substance shall be not less than 20 years or more than life, a fine not to draw the greater of that permit in accordance with the nourishment of title 18 or $4,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $10,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both (Cornell University Law School, 2007).\n\nIf any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offence has cause final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 20 years and not more than life imprisonment and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that true in accordance with the provender of title 18 or $8,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $20,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both (Cornell University Law School, 2007). In addition to this, Jennings violated 12 U.S.C. § 856 (a) Establishment of Manufacturing Operations, whi ch states that it is unlawful to:\n\n(1) knowingly open or maintain any place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance; and\n\n(2) Manage or control any building, room, or enclosure, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, or mortgagee, and knowingly and intentionally rent, lease, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the building, room, or enclosure for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance (Office of refraction Control 2007, p.1).\n\nOverall, the major offence under this case consists of three parts:\n\n(1) Possession of over one hundred grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1);\n\n(2) Endangerment of human life while manufacturing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 858 (count four).\n\n(3) dispersal of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (count five), and distribution of methamphetami ne, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (count six).\n\nFinally, from the abovementioned facts it is evident that the US system of criminal justice has handled this type of case plumb and in line with the exist legal regulations.\n\nFurther analysis indicates that it is both vicious to possess methamphetamine or PCP, as well as to possess the ingredients with the intent to manufacture such drugs. For instance, California health and recourse Code §11383(a) applies to the ingredients for methamphetamine, making it a felony: any person who possesses both methylamine and phenyl-2-propanone (phenylacetone) at the analogous time with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, or who possesses both ethylamine and phenyl-2-propanone (phenylacetone) at the same time with the intent to manufacture N-ethylamphetamine, is guilty of a felony (as cited in SQUIDOO, 2007, p.1)\n\nIn accordance with Helth and base hit Code Section 25400.10-25400.12, perilous chemicals used or produced in the manufacture of methamphetamine where those chemicals last out and where the contamination has not been doctor may contaminate properties. The felonious manufacturing of methamphetamine (meth) is a comprehensive problem in the US. The illegal manufacturing of meth relates to a number of toxic, corrosive, reactant, and flammable ingredients that after combine create products that are even more hazardous.\n\nTo this end, California Health and Safety Code §11383 (i) states that felonious methamphetamine manufacturing or transshipment center rank or site means property where a person manufactures methamphetamine or stores methamphetamine or a hazardous chemical used in connection with the manufacturing or storage and in violation of Section 11383.\n\nThe illegal manufacturing of methamphetamine includes the application of initial substances called precursors, which are altered through a number of chemical reactions to form methamphetamine. Other precursors applied indoors the manufacturing methamphetamine are pseudoephedrine and ephedrine.\n\nConsidering the abovementioned, on a national level, the US should implement effective actions to measurably reduce and disrupt the importation, distribution, and hugger-mugger manufacturing of methamphetamine. The right initiatives should be realize on all attainable levels to cope with the problem. Such initiatives should be implemented in support of the interior(a) Drug Control Strategy, which addresses the choose to increase the precaution of US citizens by advantageously reducing drug-related crime and violence.\n\n completion\n\nThe importation and distribution of methamphetamine is common in the US colleges in all states, however, the hush-hush manufacturing phenomenon, especially in Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska. Therefore, coordination of the integration and synchronization of all move agencies initiatives are required to ensure a regional unify effort. Furthermore, there is the current need to enhance and increase the let off exchange of narcotics intelligence and training among competent authorities.\n\nHence, common action will help to identify, target, and ransack organizations/individuals distributing and/or manufacturing methamphetamine. This should be stark(a) by actively collecting, analyzing, and disseminating selective information and intelligence in a timely manner (Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2007).If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment