'Progressivism Misery of the Masses'

'Progressivism - harm of the Masses\n\n[i:7a88bc7b81]Question: How did advancementives specify penury? wherefore was that essential? Where and why did progressive solutions for the problems of motive f completely pathetic?\n\nIf there was cardinal period of American history that could be labeled the close to influential or constructive to the candor of our society today, perchance it would be the reformist bowel movement. A intellectual may be progressives were not once morest the American system, they just cherished to fix it. They believed potently in the earnest of humanity, fairness, and regulation. Truly conservatives at heart, they wanted to double back back to the geezerhood of equality of opportunity, democracy, and societal justice. Equality, fairness, opportunity whole predominately applied to the short(p) pitce they were most believably the ones being interpreted advantage of. In light of need progressives, however, had a ofttimes different fas cinate than the sin of the individualist. Poverty, in their eyes, was directly colligate to the purlieu and opportunities an individual was presented with. This outlook was important be progress to it was at the root of all the reforms progressives lobbied for. moreover idealistic and eleemosynary the efforts of progressives were to eliminate poverty, they were attach to with mis-education and poor treatments.\n\nThe progressive views of poverty ar fairly transparent: poverty is the convergence of failures of the government and the environment it creates. Driven by social justice, hoi polloi handle Jacob Riis showed the bad reality of poverty to the rest of the world. In this particular case, he utilize photographs to potently illustrate the effectuate from abuses of an industrial society. Riis and others like Jane Addams, Theodore Dreiser, and Frank Norris all took up the cause for the needy and created benevolence for the less fortunate. The absolute majority of progressives steered a track from the render of self sin that brought about slightly of the evils of society they were conflict against: alcoholism, corruption, prostitution, and drug abuse. This again fuses the idea that the flavor of the poor was a direct return of the environment in which they lived.\n\nBecause of the secular way progressives looked at the poor, they used unorthodox and innovational methods rather than the evangelistic means of the late(prenominal) great awakenings. The progress of social good moved from the colonisation house movement to the social histrion which was committed full...If you want to get a full essay, lay out it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'