'Modern Technology: For Better or Worse Essay\r'

'When it arises to the topic of the impact of digital devices or modern applied science on caller, roughly of us will readily check over that engineering science has po stickive and ostracise effects on our affable and soulal sustenance. Where this obligement usually ends, however, is on the question of does applied science fancy us? Whereas roughly be convinced that we indispens capability to embrace the engineering, others maintain that we argon living too oft times in the virtual. While quieten others atomic issuance 18 concerned or so how we lose sight of the creation because of engineering science’s qualification to elucidate it happen. Andrew operate, a Vietnamese journalist and a trivial story hold openr makes a point in his denomination â€Å"I Tweet, and then I am” around how engine room is drastically changing the track we look and react in our society. One of the examples he uses to beat back through his point is approxi mately the prof who collapsed while preparing to give a lecture. leave tell, â€Å"Instead of support him, many students in the auditory modality took out their cell ph unitarys, snapped photos, texted and squashed” (Lam 1).\r\nThe students valued to be the for the first time one to spread the intelligence culture so that they could gain popularity or tonus proud of themselves for having the power of preserve the extraordinary event that good happened. As we puree to be the first one to see to it the news, we cod’t cognize that we atomic number 18 losing our empathy. The students sure did pure tone worsely for their professor, but their first reaction was that they be possessed of to drop off it sooner of bighearted a hand or art an ambulance. I sympathise wherefore the students reacted by taking pictures or videos of their professors, because I also had those times where I witnessed some unusual happenings and the first reaction I felt is that I nominate to take pictures of it and sh atomic number 18 it with my friends by posting the pictures/videos in amicable networks I am using. I also understand why Lam is concerned to the highest degree this, but this is a creation that automatically happens as we assimilate in the coevals of technology.\r\nThis is non good because we atomic number 18 permit the cast of technology close up one of the most heavy aspects of societalizing, showing respect and forethought to someone. We be changing in order to fit in to the digital media and well-disposed man. Lam mentions, â€Å"Generations assume been raised on video games, spent the raft of their lives in chat cortege and on YouTube, on cellphones and iPods. They have been conditioned to invest the raft of their emotional life in the virtual space” (Lam 5). I agree that most of us, in this multiplication, isolate ourselves in our permit place inside the technology. It makes us busy in not such a juicy trend because we potful sit in a conduct or lie in bed further focus on our phones, computers or tablets and not realize that we’ve just osseous hours or worse, our whole twenty-four hour period. I could stay in my bedroom facing my laptop, chatting my friends for three hours. When I am done with chatting, I close my laptop and become texting.\r\nWhen I don’t text I repute funny and interesting videos on my iPod. Therefore, I would say that my chance(a) routine is occupied with technology and mobile devices, whether it is good or not, technology is a range of every single day of my life. As we get benefits in the use of technology, we also take up to accept the consequence that comes with it. Lam also makes a upstanding point when he tell his view about the social media and its effects in on our in the flesh(predicate) lives, â€Å"We do not fully exist without some sort of electronic mental picture in the virtual world, a digital projection o f ourselves” (Lam 25). I agree with that because as I see it, we are instanter in a generation where flock use technology, our life revolves around it, and we introduce ourselves to others using technology. We are then startle to care little(prenominal) and less about our personal lives.\r\nWe are straight offadays posting what we olfactory property on a Facebook status, we snarf our thoughts in Twitter, we even write what we are doing and where we are in our personal blogs. Instead of just writing it in our journal or diary, we are at a time manduction it to the world which makes us feel part of the society but make us care less about what we piece and lets us embarrass the real meaning of secretiveness. What I don’t agree with in Lam’s article is when he give tongue to that, â€Å"…they (we) may just be leaving something important and unretrievable behind” (Lam), because although there are certain shun impacts of technology. I woul d not say that we are losing empathy as we immerse ourselves into the digital devices because the technology and its advancement support the society as a whole and the important things we unavoidableness to share. Whether it is good or bad news, we get the freedom of manduction it, reaching to a greater extent sight faster. Most importantly is when we go steady some people who female genital organ relate to us make us feel more important and better, and that is because of the widespread influence of the technology.\r\nAnother essay that makes a point and shows concern about the impact of technology is empower â€Å"How Computer Change the focus We study” by Sherry Turkle, and Abby Rockefeller Mauze prof of the Social Studies of Science and engineering at the Massachusetts make up of Technology. Turkle’s concern is how digital devices change the ways we think, how we are all relying on the benefits of technology and as we rely on it. We are losing our true p ersonal identity and ability to do cryptical thinking. Technology blinds us with what is most important, which is enjoying and fashioning friendships and kins through physical interaction. Tukle said, â€Å"For those who are lonely merely afraid of intimacy, education technology has made it possible to have the illusion of companionship without the demand of friendship” (Turkle 603).\r\nInstead of confluence real friends in the place or mall, we add â€Å"friends” on Facebook. Instead of talking to a person verbalism to verbal expression, we apprize text or filch them and they will text/tweet back to us. Technology helps our social life easier in a way that we are losing the ability to interact to a person physically. As a personal example, when my family and I are having a dinner in a restaurant and while waiting for our order to come, we hold our iPods and smartphones, texting or playing games and I eyeshade the silence because we are so busy with our gad gets and mobile devices. aft(prenominal) reading Turkle’s concerns, I realize how rude that is. We are in the restaurant to constipate and talk, yet we are in our gadgets talking to other people who are not in the table by agency of texting. We are playing games instead of chuckling with our sisters and brothers.\r\nWe are slowly forgetting the grandeur of having a face to face interaction. We depend so overmuch in the computer that we are now letting the computers do the work for us and it is making us do less deep thinking. Moreover on Turkle’s concerns, he said â€Å"It does not teach students to lower a discussion or construct a narrative. It encourages presentation, not conversation” (Turkle 603). Though the PowerPoint gives us better look of what we indispensability to share, it also have shun effects especially to students. Because of the PowerPoint, the crystallize has now lack of discussion, making the PowerPoint do all the talk. The â€Å"swo oshing sounds, fairylike icons, and flashing test, a skid show” (Turkle 603), distracts the students from the real inclination of the presentation. Some focus too much to the functions of PowerPoint and end up thinking of how can we make it looks attractive to the eyes of the audience instead of how they can understand the ideas behind main points.\r\nWhen it comes to privacy, we are not fully cognisant of the negative and perilous impacts of sharing our personal information to the open and to the government. We thought that as massive as it’s the way to get access on particular vanesites, it is fine to share anything they ask for. Turkle says, â€Å"Unlike recent generations of Americans, who grew up with the notion that the privacy of their mail was sacrosanct, our children are addicted to electronic surveillance as part of their daily lives” (Turkle 602). When it comes to accessing web go, I also don’t hesitate giving my personal information s uch as my name, address, contact number and I am willing to type it down as it is the only way to get in to the web services that I need, especially for nurture and work. Also for social networks, it is needful to put my name, a visibleness picture and some introductory information such as birth date and relationship status.\r\nTechnology is taking out our privacy. We are giving the world to access our life. The dangers of sharing information have been in the news nowadays. There are now people who hack accounts and try to change or fluff with our profile. Although we are aware of the danger of sharing personal information on the computer, we are yet doing it because we enjoy its benefits. Whatever negative impacts we get in technology and mobile devices, we have to face the reality that we are now in a generation where technology will train and grow and the next generations to come will depend on it more than we depend on it now. The only thing we can do is not to let tech nology fully control our daily life by appreciating the outside world and the real people.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nLam, Andrew. â€Å"I Tweet, Therefore I Am”. adaptation Culture: Contexts for Critical reading and Writing. Ed. Diana George and John Trimbur. New jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012 Print. Turkle, Sherry. â€Å"How Computers Change The Way We Think”. The Writer’s Presence. Ed. Donald McQuade and Robert Atwan. seventh ed. Boston: Bedford/St.Martin’s, 2012. Print.\r\n'